Blockchain Developer Salary, How Much Does One Really Make?

Guess who has been paying the salary of Bitcoin Core's head developer...

Guess who has been paying the salary of Bitcoin Core's head developer... submitted by jstolfi to Buttcoin [link] [comments]

Hiring full time PHP/Javascript Full Stack Developers - your salary can paid in Bitcoin (or other cryptocurrency, or even fiat)

submitted by zzzzz_ to Jobs4Bitcoins [link] [comments]

Everything that happened this week summed up! LOCAL.BITCOIN.COM is Live, $850K Blockstream Developer Salary? Badger for IOs Out Now!

Everything that happened this week summed up! LOCAL.BITCOIN.COM is Live, $850K Blockstream Developer Salary? Badger for IOs Out Now! submitted by SweetSweetCrypto to btc [link] [comments]

Everything that happened this week summed up! LOCAL.BITCOIN.COM is Live, $850K Blockstream Developer Salary? Badger for IOs Out Now!

Everything that happened this week summed up! LOCAL.BITCOIN.COM is Live, $850K Blockstream Developer Salary? Badger for IOs Out Now! submitted by SweetSweetCrypto to Bitcoincash [link] [comments]

07-05 11:03 - 'Average Salary of Blockchain Developer' (self.Bitcoin) by /u/ConsciousFormal6 removed from /r/Bitcoin within 27-37min

'''
The demand for blockchain developers is increasing by the day. This is due to the fact that the blockchain technology itself does not stand still and progressively penetrates into a variety of fields of human endeavor. And since it is an emerging technology there are not enough qualified developers for hire. The requirements for them are specific and involve a particular set of skills. Companies are looking for software developers who have work experience in Github and who had the opportunity to work in open source projects. Besides, candidates should at least have immense knowledge in C/C++ as the majority of the projects are written on it. Along with it, a knowledge of Java, JavaScript, Python and in some cases Ruby, Solidity is also needed. Potential blockchain developers should feel comfortable working with multiple programming languages and have some understanding of cryptography. This kind of developers is particularly valuable in the blockchain market and can count on better-paying jobs. To be convinced of this let's take a look at the infographic mapping the country-specific blockchain developers’ salary: Switzerland - 120k-180k USD annually Singapore - 120-150k USD annually Australia - 110-130k USD annually Canada - 100k-130k USD annually U.S. - 100k-110k USD annually Germany - 60k-150k USD annually Great Britain - 50k-90k USD annually South Korea - 80k USD annually Japan - 50-80k USD annually UAE - 60k USD annually Russia - 40-60k USD annually China - up to 45k USD annually India - up to 20k USD annually Furthermore, there are different Bug Bounty Programs where practiced blockchain developers are welcomed. Participants of such activities are called Bug Bounty Hunters. Their goal is to find vulnerabilities in software, websites, and web applications. These programs give an opportunity to earn lots of money that can be a major or extra income for blockchain developers. The average period of Bug Bounty Campaign is 2-3 months during which the “hunters” have an option to identify any errors and receive rewards from 100$ to 10000$ depending on the degree of the bug. Notable examples of the blockchain companies who provide Bug Bounty Programs are EOS, Ethereum, Ripple, TRON, Dash, etc. Hence, in the recent EOS program, more than 50 developers took part and managed to report approximately 100 bugs half of which are critical. One of the most relevant Bug Bounty Campaign is the one that was launched by Credits Blockchain Platform on June 27. The program has an overall prize fund of 500 000$ and each specific reward varies depending on the severity of the flaw and location. If a person finds an error and proposes the legitimate amendments, a triple reward is provided. All developers and security experts can participate and open season on bugs. Ultimately, one thing's for sure, blockchain developer skills are in demand and there are lots of blockchain companies willing to pay high salaries to such kind of staff member. There is a lot of money to make in this space both as a major and extra income that allows developers to pocket a considerable sum but at the same time requires from give a great knowledge of technical aspects of the blockchain sphere.
'''
Average Salary of Blockchain Developer
Go1dfish undelete link
unreddit undelete link
Author: ConsciousFormal6
submitted by removalbot to removalbot [link] [comments]

LOCAL.BITCOIN.COM is Live, $850K Blockstream Developer Salary? Badger for IOs Out Now! by Bitcoin.com - Official Channel

LOCAL.BITCOIN.COM is Live, $850K Blockstream Developer Salary? Badger for IOs Out Now! by Bitcoin.com - Official Channel submitted by cashman04 to FindBacklink [link] [comments]

Everything that happened this week summed up! LOCAL.BITCOIN.COM is Live, $850K Blockstream Developer Salary? Badger for IOs Out Now!

Everything that happened this week summed up! LOCAL.BITCOIN.COM is Live, $850K Blockstream Developer Salary? Badger for IOs Out Now! submitted by vegasbooty to Cryptoandme [link] [comments]

RT @SDLerner: 1/10 Basic info: RSK is an open source side-chain to Bitcoin and it uses smart bitcoins to pay for transaction fess ("gas"). The ticker name is RBTC. Mainnet Launched JAN-2018. RSK Labs pays salaries to contributors (>20 developers). Huobi/Bitfinex trade BTC/RBTC ~1:1.

submitted by Natonamco to rootstock [link] [comments]

Hiring Javascript developer (Bitcoin salary)

Hiring Javascript developer (Bitcoin salary) submitted by mbarulli to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

The average salary of a Blockchain Professional is 45% more than their peers. Join the revolution with Sate Development's Blockchain Training program today! /r/Bitcoin

The average salary of a Blockchain Professional is 45% more than their peers. Join the revolution with Sate Development's Blockchain Training program today! /Bitcoin submitted by ABitcoinAllBot to BitcoinAll [link] [comments]

11-26 07:04 - 'With $334,000 we can fund salaries for software development in, say Lightning Network. It could be a much more worthy project. / Stop this stupid bubble mentality. Nothing good can come from even more ignorants buying bitcoin.' by /u/crypto6zf0di removed from /r/Bitcoin within 0-6min

'''
With $334,000 we can fund salaries for software development in, say Lightning Network. It could be a much more worthy project.
Stop this stupid bubble mentality. Nothing good can come from even more ignorants buying bitcoin.
'''
Context Link
Go1dfish undelete link
unreddit undelete link
Author: crypto6zf0di
submitted by removalbot to removalbot [link] [comments]

11-26 07:44 - 'With $334,000 we can fund salaries for software development in, say Lightning Network. It could be a much more worthy project. / Stop this stupid bubble mentality. Nothing good can come from even more ignorants buying bitcoin.' by /u/bitmad9ldd97 removed from /r/Bitcoin within 0-9min

'''
With $334,000 we can fund salaries for software development in, say Lightning Network. It could be a much more worthy project.
Stop this stupid bubble mentality. Nothing good can come from even more ignorants buying bitcoin.
'''
Context Link
Go1dfish undelete link
unreddit undelete link
Author: bitmad9ldd97
submitted by removalbot to removalbot [link] [comments]

11-26 08:03 - 'With $334,000 we can fund salaries for software development in, say Lightning Network. It could be a much more worthy project. / Stop this stupid bubble mentality. Nothing good can come from even more ignorants buying bitcoin.' by /u/bitmady75354 removed from /r/Bitcoin within 0-3min

'''
With $334,000 we can fund salaries for software development in, say Lightning Network. It could be a much more worthy project.
Stop this stupid bubble mentality. Nothing good can come from even more ignorants buying bitcoin.
'''
Context Link
Go1dfish undelete link
unreddit undelete link
Author: bitmady75354
submitted by removalbot to removalbot [link] [comments]

11-26 07:35 - 'With $334,000 we can fund salaries for software development in, say Lightning Network. It could be a much more worthy project. / Stop this stupid bubble mentality. Nothing good can come from even more ignorants buying bitcoin.' by /u/bitmadvrs removed from /r/Bitcoin within 0-5min

'''
With $334,000 we can fund salaries for software development in, say Lightning Network. It could be a much more worthy project.
Stop this stupid bubble mentality. Nothing good can come from even more ignorants buying bitcoin.
'''
Context Link
Go1dfish undelete link
unreddit undelete link
Author: bitmadvrs
submitted by removalbot to removalbot [link] [comments]

11-26 07:43 - 'With $334,000 we can fund salaries for software development in, say Lightning Network. It could be a much more worthy project. / Stop this stupid bubble mentality. Nothing good can come from even more ignorants buying bitcoin.' by /u/bitmad6v40hk removed from /r/Bitcoin within 0-10min

'''
With $334,000 we can fund salaries for software development in, say Lightning Network. It could be a much more worthy project.
Stop this stupid bubble mentality. Nothing good can come from even more ignorants buying bitcoin.
'''
Context Link
Go1dfish undelete link
unreddit undelete link
Author: bitmad6v40hk
submitted by removalbot to removalbot [link] [comments]

11-26 08:22 - 'With $334,000 we can fund salaries for software development in, say Lightning Network. It could be a much more worthy project. / Stop this stupid bubble mentality. Nothing good can come from even more ignorants buying bitcoin.' by /u/bitmadyol89w removed from /r/Bitcoin within 5-15min

'''
With $334,000 we can fund salaries for software development in, say Lightning Network. It could be a much more worthy project.
Stop this stupid bubble mentality. Nothing good can come from even more ignorants buying bitcoin.
'''
Context Link
Go1dfish undelete link
unreddit undelete link
Author: bitmadyol89w
submitted by removalbot to removalbot [link] [comments]

11-26 07:26 - 'With $334,000 we can fund salaries for software development in, say Lightning Network. It could be a much more worthy project. / Stop this stupid bubble mentality. Nothing good can come from even more ignorants buying bitcoin.' by /u/crypto9148as removed from /r/Bitcoin within 0-2min

'''
With $334,000 we can fund salaries for software development in, say Lightning Network. It could be a much more worthy project.
Stop this stupid bubble mentality. Nothing good can come from even more ignorants buying bitcoin.
'''
Context Link
Go1dfish undelete link
unreddit undelete link
Author: crypto9148as
submitted by removalbot to removalbot [link] [comments]

Cash: use it or lose it!

Is this the last decade of cash?

The corona pandemic is not helping. Belgian media is picking up the Australian news about the coronavirus found active 28 days on banknotes, without understanding that the 28 days is on the Australian polymer and paper banknotes, while Euro banknotes are made of cotton fibers on which the coronavirus gets inactive rather quick. https://medicalxpress.com/news/2020-04-euro-banknotes-safe-coronavirus-ecb.html
You are touching so much in shops, including the pay terminals everyone is touching, that cash won't add much risk.

Until this year, I used to not care, and pay everything electronically.

But in March I became the victim of an identity theft. My bank account was frozen, my bank cards and payment app blocked. Opening new bank accounts or credit cards was impossible due to being on a blacklist.

My employer could not pay my salary in cash. For most professions this is forbidden by law since 2016.

Friends lent me cash. But I discovered cash was refused at supermarkets, shops, public transport, parkings, fuel stations, hospital, physiotherapist, online webshops, Uber, Deliveroo, etc. Sometimes because of corona anxiety, but often already from before 2020.

Prepaid cards could be a nice solution. But even while they are debit cards, in Belgium they seem to be refused where credit cards are refused, since they are Visa or Mastercards cards. These are refused in many Belgium places, since merchants don't like the higher costs. Not many prepaid cards allow charging with cash. And their availability is in recent decline: this year at least the following prepaid cards stopped or are announced to stop: Carrefour prepaid Flex card, BNP and Hello. The decline might be due to new very strict EU anti-money laundering laws. The anonymous prepaid cards (and generic gift cards) are now restricted to 100 euro maximum recharge in their lifetime and 50 euro payments.

Cryptocurrencies are also in theory a nice solution. But their acceptance in Belgium is extremely limited. Thanks to Takeaway accepting bitcoin, I could order delivery from many local snack restaurants.
But I discovered that bitcoin and most other cryptocurrencies, while having an "anonymous" reputation, are actually only pseudonymous and extremely open and transparent: for every transaction the origin address, destination address, amount and timestamp are recorded for eternity in a public ledger for everyone open to consult. When I buy something, the merchant can see how many coins I have in my wallet address. Buying, spending or selling coins are activities that can get your name connected to your addresses. Developers try to solve this privacy issue, but I'm afraid the war on anonymity (related to the war on cash) will crush that before cryptocurrency payments become popular.

So, my identity theft experience has awakened me: sharing your personal details in so many places caries a lot of danger. Think about it: while the law became more strict, there are still many (online) shops and restaurants taking knowledge of your credit card number, expiry date, CCV and your name. That's still enough information to do fraudulent payments in many places.

The cashless society is a surveillance society, with every payment traced. And it creates a lot of dependencies: electricity, internet, and permission by the banking and payment system. Once you are on a blacklist, even if you did nothing wrong, but somebody pretended to be you and did fraudulent payments, you are screwed for at least months.

So, now that I'm finally off the blacklist, I opened several bank accounts. That will not help for all issues, but still: having only 1 bank is really dangerous.

And from now on I pay everything possible with cash. Not just to keep my personal details safe, but also to keep the cash usage statistics high. Did you notice that the financial sector is regulary reporting the cash withdrawals decline? They report both the total amount withdrawn and the number of withdrawals.

I learned that the bank and payment processors are fighting a war on cash and they are actively lobbying the government for a reduction of the cash payment limit to 50 euro. Yes, an insane fifty euro! The banks are lazy about cash and want to impose negative rent without risking a bankrun. No cash is no bankrun. The payment processors just love the percentage they get from every payment.

Currently the acceptance of euro banknotes and coins for debts is compulsory by European law. But many merchants violated the law and we had at least one Belgian minister ignoring the enforcement. See e.g. this article from 2019: https://www.bruzz.be/samenleving/no-cash-doet-intrede-brusselse-horeca-2019-05-10.
The law has exceptions, e.g. for security reasons such as a pandemic. After the pandemic I will try to report all cash refusing merchants.
Merchants that refuse to accept cash payments can be reported at https://meldpunt.belgie.be or https://pointdecontact.belgique.be/. But I guess it is better to wait until after the pandemic.

We need to defend the right to use cash. And a crucial action to avoid the end of cash is to keep using it as much as possible.

Every time you pay with a bank card or app, you contribute to a cashless future where:
Use cash or lose it!
submitted by piabxl to belgium [link] [comments]

Proposal: The Sia Foundation

Vision Statement

A common sentiment is brewing online; a shared desire for the internet that might have been. After decades of corporate encroachment, you don't need to be a power user to realize that something has gone very wrong.
In the early days of the internet, the future was bright. In that future, when you sent an instant message, it traveled directly to the recipient. When you needed to pay a friend, you announced a transfer of value to their public key. When an app was missing a feature you wanted, you opened up the source code and implemented it. When you took a picture on your phone, it was immediately encrypted and backed up to storage that you controlled. In that future, people would laugh at the idea of having to authenticate themselves to some corporation before doing these things.
What did we get instead? Rather than a network of human-sized communities, we have a handful of enormous commons, each controlled by a faceless corporate entity. Hey user, want to send a message? You can, but we'll store a copy of it indefinitely, unencrypted, for our preference-learning algorithms to pore over; how else could we slap targeted ads on every piece of content you see? Want to pay a friend? You can—in our Monopoly money. Want a new feature? Submit a request to our Support Center and we'll totally maybe think about it. Want to backup a photo? You can—inside our walled garden, which only we (and the NSA, of course) can access. Just be careful what you share, because merely locking you out of your account and deleting all your data is far from the worst thing we could do.
You rationalize this: "MEGACORP would never do such a thing; it would be bad for business." But we all know, at some level, that this state of affairs, this inversion of power, is not merely "unfortunate" or "suboptimal" – No. It is degrading. Even if MEGACORP were purely benevolent, it is degrading that we must ask its permission to talk to our friends; that we must rely on it to safeguard our treasured memories; that our digital lives are completely beholden to those who seek only to extract value from us.
At the root of this issue is the centralization of data. MEGACORP can surveil you—because your emails and video chats flow through their servers. And MEGACORP can control you—because they hold your data hostage. But centralization is a solution to a technical problem: How can we make the user's data accessible from anywhere in the world, on any device? For a long time, no alternative solution to this problem was forthcoming.
Today, thanks to a confluence of established techniques and recent innovations, we have solved the accessibility problem without resorting to centralization. Hashing, encryption, and erasure encoding got us most of the way, but one barrier remained: incentives. How do you incentivize an anonymous stranger to store your data? Earlier protocols like BitTorrent worked around this limitation by relying on altruism, tit-for-tat requirements, or "points" – in other words, nothing you could pay your electric bill with. Finally, in 2009, a solution appeared: Bitcoin. Not long after, Sia was born.
Cryptography has unleashed the latent power of the internet by enabling interactions between mutually-distrustful parties. Sia harnesses this power to turn the cloud storage market into a proper marketplace, where buyers and sellers can transact directly, with no intermediaries, anywhere in the world. No more silos or walled gardens: your data is encrypted, so it can't be spied on, and it's stored on many servers, so no single entity can hold it hostage. Thanks to projects like Sia, the internet is being re-decentralized.
Sia began its life as a startup, which means it has always been subjected to two competing forces: the ideals of its founders, and the profit motive inherent to all businesses. Its founders have taken great pains to never compromise on the former, but this often threatened the company's financial viability. With the establishment of the Sia Foundation, this tension is resolved. The Foundation, freed of the obligation to generate profit, is a pure embodiment of the ideals from which Sia originally sprung.
The goals and responsibilities of the Foundation are numerous: to maintain core Sia protocols and consensus code; to support developers building on top of Sia and its protocols; to promote Sia and facilitate partnerships in other spheres and communities; to ensure that users can easily acquire and safely store siacoins; to develop network scalability solutions; to implement hardforks and lead the community through them; and much more. In a broader sense, its mission is to commoditize data storage, making it cheap, ubiquitous, and accessible to all, without compromising privacy or performance.
Sia is a perfect example of how we can achieve better living through cryptography. We now begin a new chapter in Sia's history. May our stewardship lead it into a bright future.
 

Overview

Today, we are proposing the creation of the Sia Foundation: a new non-profit entity that builds and supports distributed cloud storage infrastructure, with a specific focus on the Sia storage platform. What follows is an informal overview of the Sia Foundation, covering two major topics: how the Foundation will be funded, and what its funds will be used for.

Organizational Structure

The Sia Foundation will be structured as a non-profit entity incorporated in the United States, likely a 501(c)(3) organization or similar. The actions of the Foundation will be constrained by its charter, which formalizes the specific obligations and overall mission outlined in this document. The charter will be updated on an annual basis to reflect the current goals of the Sia community.
The organization will be operated by a board of directors, initially comprising Luke Champine as President and Eddie Wang as Chairman. Luke Champine will be leaving his position at Nebulous to work at the Foundation full-time, and will seek to divest his shares of Nebulous stock along with other potential conflicts of interest. Neither Luke nor Eddie personally own any siafunds or significant quantities of siacoin.

Funding

The primary source of funding for the Foundation will come from a new block subsidy. Following a hardfork, 30 KS per block will be allocated to the "Foundation Fund," continuing in perpetuity. The existing 30 KS per block miner reward is not affected. Additionally, one year's worth of block subsidies (approximately 1.57 GS) will be allocated to the Fund immediately upon activation of the hardfork.
As detailed below, the Foundation will provably burn any coins that it cannot meaningfully spend. As such, the 30 KS subsidy should be viewed as a maximum. This allows the Foundation to grow alongside Sia without requiring additional hardforks.
The Foundation will not be funded to any degree by the possession or sale of siafunds. Siafunds were originally introduced as a means of incentivizing growth, and we still believe in their effectiveness: a siafund holder wants to increase the amount of storage on Sia as much as possible. While the Foundation obviously wants Sia to succeed, its driving force should be its charter. Deriving significant revenue from siafunds would jeopardize the Foundation's impartiality and focus. Ultimately, we want the Foundation to act in the best interests of Sia, not in growing its own budget.

Responsibilities

The Foundation inherits a great number of responsibilities from Nebulous. Each quarter, the Foundation will publish the progress it has made over the past quarter, and list the responsibilities it intends to prioritize over the coming quarter. This will be accompanied by a financial report, detailing each area of expenditure over the past quarter, and forecasting expenditures for the coming quarter. Below, we summarize some of the myriad responsibilities towards which the Foundation is expected to allocate its resources.

Maintain and enhance core Sia software

Arguably, this is the most important responsibility of the Foundation. At the heart of Sia is its consensus algorithm: regardless of other differences, all Sia software must agree upon the content and rules of the blockchain. It is therefore crucial that the algorithm be stewarded by an entity that is accountable to the community, transparent in its decision-making, and has no profit motive or other conflicts of interest.
Accordingly, Sia’s consensus functionality will no longer be directly maintained by Nebulous. Instead, the Foundation will release and maintain an implementation of a "minimal Sia full node," comprising the Sia consensus algorithm and P2P networking code. The source code will be available in a public repository, and signed binaries will be published for each release.
Other parties may use this code to provide alternative full node software. For example, Nebulous may extend the minimal full node with wallet, renter, and host functionality. The source code of any such implementation may be submitted to the Foundation for review. If the code passes review, the Foundation will provide "endorsement signatures" for the commit hash used and for binaries compiled internally by the Foundation. Specifically, these signatures assert that the Foundation believes the software contains no consensus-breaking changes or other modifications to imported Foundation code. Endorsement signatures and Foundation-compiled binaries may be displayed and distributed by the receiving party, along with an appropriate disclaimer.
A minimal full node is not terribly useful on its own; the wallet, renter, host, and other extensions are what make Sia a proper developer platform. Currently, the only implementations of these extensions are maintained by Nebulous. The Foundation will contract Nebulous to ensure that these extensions continue to receive updates and enhancements. Later on, the Foundation intends to develop its own implementations of these extensions and others. As with the minimal node software, these extensions will be open source and available in public repositories for use by any Sia node software.
With the consensus code now managed by the Foundation, the task of implementing and orchestrating hardforks becomes its responsibility as well. When the Foundation determines that a hardfork is necessary (whether through internal discussion or via community petition), a formal proposal will be drafted and submitted for public review, during which arguments for and against the proposal may be submitted to a public repository. During this time, the hardfork code will be implemented, either by Foundation employees or by external contributors working closely with the Foundation. Once the implementation is finished, final arguments will be heard. The Foundation board will then vote whether to accept or reject the proposal, and announce their decision along with appropriate justification. Assuming the proposal was accepted, the Foundation will announce the block height at which the hardfork will activate, and will subsequently release source code and signed binaries that incorporate the hardfork code.
Regardless of the Foundation's decision, it is the community that ultimately determines whether a fork is accepted or rejected – nothing can change that. Foundation node software will never automatically update, so all forks must be explicitly adopted by users. Furthermore, the Foundation will provide replay and wipeout protection for its hard forks, protecting other chains from unintended or malicious reorgs. Similarly, the Foundation will ensure that any file contracts formed prior to a fork activation will continue to be honored on both chains until they expire.
Finally, the Foundation also intends to pursue scalability solutions for the Sia blockchain. In particular, work has already begun on an implementation of Utreexo, which will greatly reduce the space requirements of fully-validating nodes (allowing a full node to be run on a smartphone) while increasing throughput and decreasing initial sync time. A hardfork implementing Utreexo will be submitted to the community as per the process detailed above.
As this is the most important responsibility of the Foundation, it will receive a significant portion of the Foundation’s budget, primarily in the form of developer salaries and contracting agreements.

Support community services

We intend to allocate 25% of the Foundation Fund towards the community. This allocation will be held and disbursed in the form of siacoins, and will pay for grants, bounties, hackathons, and other community-driven endeavours.
Any community-run service, such as a Skynet portal, explorer or web wallet, may apply to have its costs covered by the Foundation. Upon approval, the Foundation will reimburse expenses incurred by the service, subject to the exact terms agreed to. The intent of these grants is not to provide a source of income, but rather to make such services "break even" for their operators, so that members of the community can enrich the Sia ecosystem without worrying about the impact on their own finances.

Ensure easy acquisition and storage of siacoins

Most users will acquire their siacoins via an exchange. The Foundation will provide support to Sia-compatible exchanges, and pursue relevant integrations at its discretion, such as Coinbase's new Rosetta standard. The Foundation may also release DEX software that enables trading cryptocurrencies without the need for a third party. (The Foundation itself will never operate as a money transmitter.)
Increasingly, users are storing their cryptocurrency on hardware wallets. The Foundation will maintain the existing Ledger Nano S integration, and pursue further integrations at its discretion.
Of course, all hardware wallets must be paired with software running on a computer or smartphone, so the Foundation will also develop and/or maintain client-side wallet software, including both full-node wallets and "lite" wallets. Community-operated wallet services, i.e. web wallets, may be funded via grants.
Like core software maintenance, this responsibility will be funded in the form of developer salaries and contracting agreements.

Protect the ecosystem

When it comes to cryptocurrency security, patching software vulnerabilities is table stakes; there are significant legal and social threats that we must be mindful of as well. As such, the Foundation will earmark a portion of its fund to defend the community from legal action. The Foundation will also safeguard the network from 51% attacks and other threats to network security by implementing softforks and/or hardforks where necessary.
The Foundation also intends to assist in the development of a new FOSS software license, and to solicit legal memos on various Sia-related matters, such as hosting in the United States and the EU.
In a broader sense, the establishment of the Foundation makes the ecosystem more robust by transferring core development to a more neutral entity. Thanks to its funding structure, the Foundation will be immune to various forms of pressure that for-profit companies are susceptible to.

Drive adoption of Sia

Although the overriding goal of the Foundation is to make Sia the best platform it can be, all that work will be in vain if no one uses the platform. There are a number of ways the Foundation can promote Sia and get it into the hands of potential users and developers.
In-person conferences are understandably far less popular now, but the Foundation can sponsor and/or participate in virtual conferences. (In-person conferences may be held in the future, permitting circumstances.) Similarly, the Foundation will provide prizes for hackathons, which may be organized by community members, Nebulous, or the Foundation itself. Lastly, partnerships with other companies in the cryptocurrency space—or the cloud storage space—are a great way to increase awareness of Sia. To handle these responsibilities, one of the early priorities of the Foundation will be to hire a marketing director.

Fund Management

The Foundation Fund will be controlled by a multisig address. Each member of the Foundation's board will control one of the signing keys, with the signature threshold to be determined once the final composition of the board is known. (This threshold may also be increased or decreased if the number of board members changes.) Additionally, one timelocked signing key will be controlled by David Vorick. This key will act as a “dead man’s switch,” to be used in the event of an emergency that prevents Foundation board members from reaching the signature threshold. The timelock ensures that this key cannot be used unless the Foundation fails to sign a transaction for several months.
On the 1st of each month, the Foundation will use its keys to transfer all siacoins in the Fund to two new addresses. The first address will be controlled by a high-security hot wallet, and will receive approximately one month's worth of Foundation expenditures. The second address, receiving the remaining siacoins, will be a modified version of the source address: specifically, it will increase the timelock on David Vorick's signing key by one month. Any other changes to the set of signing keys, such as the arrival or departure of board members, will be incorporated into this address as well.
The Foundation Fund is allocated in SC, but many of the Foundation's expenditures must be paid in USD or other fiat currency. Accordingly, the Foundation will convert, at its discretion, a portion of its monthly withdrawals to fiat currency. We expect this conversion to be primarily facilitated by private "OTC" sales to accredited investors. The Foundation currently has no plans to speculate in cryptocurrency or other assets.
Finally, it is important that the Foundation adds value to the Sia platform well in excess of the inflation introduced by the block subsidy. For this reason, the Foundation intends to provably burn, on a quarterly basis, any coins that it cannot allocate towards any justifiable expense. In other words, coins will be burned whenever doing so provides greater value to the platform than any other use. Furthermore, the Foundation will cap its SC treasury at 5% of the total supply, and will cap its USD treasury at 4 years’ worth of predicted expenses.
 
Addendum: Hardfork Timeline
We would like to see this proposal finalized and accepted by the community no later than September 30th. A new version of siad, implementing the hardfork, will be released no later than October 15th. The hardfork will activate at block 293220, which is expected to occur around 12pm EST on January 1st, 2021.
 
Addendum: Inflation specifics
The total supply of siacoins as of January 1st, 2021 will be approximately 45.243 GS. The initial subsidy of 1.57 GS thus increases the supply by 3.47%, and the total annual inflation in 2021 will be at most 10.4% (if zero coins are burned). In 2022, total annual inflation will be at most 6.28%, and will steadily decrease in subsequent years.
 

Conclusion

We see the establishment of the Foundation as an important step in the maturation of the Sia project. It provides the ecosystem with a sustainable source of funding that can be exclusively directed towards achieving Sia's ambitious goals. Compared to other projects with far deeper pockets, Sia has always punched above its weight; once we're on equal footing, there's no telling what we'll be able to achieve.
Nevertheless, we do not propose this change lightly, and have taken pains to ensure that the Foundation will act in accordance with the ideals that this community shares. It will operate transparently, keep inflation to a minimum, and respect the user's fundamental role in decentralized systems. We hope that everyone in the community will consider this proposal carefully, and look forward to a productive discussion.
submitted by lukechampine to siacoin [link] [comments]

Finnish development firm offers to pay salaries partly in Bitcoins

Finnish development firm offers to pay salaries partly in Bitcoins submitted by CryptoJunky to CryptoCurrency [link] [comments]

"Is It Dead Yet?... You Check... No, You."

submitted by WolfOfFusion to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Mainnet project: an important change. If you are a donor, please read.

Hi everybody.
It has been one week since the mainnet project got the funding and I have an important update to make.
A little bit about the progress: I've found a wonderful developer, who is helping with the library, so it is starting to take some shape. I'm ironing out our REST API, got some useful feedback, continuing to do so. About 0.17% of the total funding spent so far.
The important update though is that I have decided to take the development and spending private, instead of public. Before I explain what that means and why, I understand that it might upset some donors. So, if you have pledged any amount and disagree with my change for any reason - please contact me (DM, or [email protected]) and I'll refund your pledge completely, no questions asked.
(Please sign any message using the address that you used to prove that you sent the funds, see the list of donors here to find your pledge and the link the the funding donation to find which address you sent from).
If more than 50% of pledges ask for money back, I'll just return everything to everybody in full and we'll consider the project cancelled. At that point anyone willing to take on the project (via a new Flipstarter or something), I'll donate the domain to them. Everything that is done so far is MIT licensed, so anyone is free to take it at any moment.
Let the market decide!
I've got to tell you that I'm a bit disappointed with our progress so far. I expected a lot of people willing to earn some money, but I've got only 4 relevant developers, 3 of them passed a very simple test, only one is actually doing anything.
This was not expected by me, when I had promised to work publicly and with BCH developers.
Another problem is that I have a certain vision that I described in the project description. In addition to that vision there is also a lot of experience talking to read.cash users. A lot of them are in countries with very bad Internet (2G, few kilobytes per second), using very old Android phones (10+ years, the size of an iPhone 4 and the speed half of that of iPhone 4).. And I also really hope that someday we will have 100MB blocks, 1GB, 1TB blocks. But now I'm tied in arguments with BCH developers who argue that many current solutions are good enough already and we don't need to change them - just build on top of a few convoluted and complex protocols, just download a block when needed (again, Africa, 2G, 100MB blocks), just download 640,000 block headers, listen to the whole mempool (with 1TB block we'll have 1TB mempool) - it's fine, blocks are tiny... Just send a few queries (now)... Just download a mempool fully.
(To those of you that know what this is about, please don't name names, I'm not here to play the blame game, everybody is entitled to their own opinions. It's fine.)
If your wallet becomes too big - create a new one. It's fine.
Sidenote: my read.cash wallet that gets the fees takes a few hours to open now, and it's barely 9 months old! I find current solutions unacceptable, I want my wallet to open up immediately and handle 100MB blocks as well as 60KB blocks.
I don't want to develop for tiny blocks or tiny wallets that need to be changed every few months.. I want huge blocks! I don't want mainnet to be as brittle as to break at the first sight of success.
A few of these discussions got me really tired and I have no leverage on these guys. They have money now, they have their vision, I have mine, described on the site, they don't want to do it my way. I didn't collect the funds to do it their way.
Yet I have made a commitment to work with them.
This is very tiresome. I feel like I've got myself into a trap - I have to work with these people, they don't want to work on my stuff.
This is just stupid.
One more thing is that now that I have Slack - I'm caught in endless private discussions of people trying to sell me their vision of how stuff should be done or questions about me or read.cash... I didn't sign up for that, I barely have any time to do the work, I don't have time for this, sorry.
Change #1: Private development
Having said that, I'm moving the project to private development.
Frankly, all I care about is to get this project done. I added an additional burden on myself to be do the public development. And it's tiresome.
The plan would be to hire some outside developers, using regular contracts, so that they don't have THEIR ideas on how to do the project and they'll just do what I described.
I think everybody cares about the end result - library working, document being written, etc...
Change #2: Private spending
Hired developers also means salaries. When people (in the real world) know salaries of other people, it leads to conflicts. I went through this experiment (public salaries) once in my life, I won't go through that again. Even people knowing your budget become a problem, since they start to bargain with you. (Again, we're talking about outside developers, they are not interested in BCH success, they are interested in getting as much money as possible)
By private spending I mean that I'll post periodically how much is done and how much funds is approximately left, but no details on who got what for what. Right now there's 99.83% funds left.
Some of you might see it as a money grab or something else - I can't blame you, but I'd rather see this project cancelled by market forces than drown in endless fights about why we should do exactly nothing or their idea, hope for small blocks and use what we have no matter how convoluted or hard it is, or why somebody's hourly rate should be bigger than that guy's.
Will this lead to everyone cancelling their donations? It sure could! It's voluntary funding after all, I can't force anyone to love what I do or how I do it.
If you donated and want a refund to your original address - just ping me.
When this post is 48 hours old, if more than 50% pledges remain, the project will move on as described above. If 50%+ cancels - everybody gets refunds to their original addresses.
submitted by readcash to btc [link] [comments]

How Much Money do Blockchain Developers Make? How to get salary from 2CAPTCHA  Payout Tutorial (Bitcoin ... Episode 21: Blockchain Developer Salaries LOCAL.BITCOIN.COM is Live, $850K Blockstream Developer Salary? Badger for IOs Out Now! Blockchain Interviews - Jimmy Song, Bitcoin Developer & Entrepreneur

Bitcoin Developer Salary Comparison by Location. Nationwide. United States. $103,319. $103,319. As of Aug 27, 2020, the average annual pay for a Bitcoin Developer in the United States is $103,319 a year. While ZipRecruiter is seeing annual salaries as high as $172,000 and as low as $23,500, the majority of Bitcoin Developer salaries currently range between $72,000 (25th percentile) to $131,000 ... Blockchain Developer Resumes . The three kinds of developer resumes and the skills needed for each are: 1. C++/ Go Developers . Object-Oriented programming. Web application development. Understanding of blockchain and Bitcoin. Skilled in Go, Java, C++, C#. Android/ iOS development. The freelance salary for a C++ or Go developer starts from $35 ... Let’s compare bitcoin or ethereum developer salary per month in different parts of the world. Eastern Europe: Europe: Asia: USA: Blockchain developer salary: $2,500-3,000: $9,000-11,000: $4,000-6,000: $10,000-12,000: Here is a percentile chart demonstrating the distribution slightly similar to the Glassdoor data. In Switzerland, for example, the salaries of blockchain developer have ... According to Hired, an average salary for a blockchain developer is between $150,000 and $175,000 per year. To compare, an average software engineer salary stands at $137,000 per year. The highest blockchain developer salary can be found in the San Francisco Bay Area – $162,288. Blockchain Developer Salary We are currently living through the early years of the 'blockchain era.' The demand for blockchain developers and engineers keeps on increasing without pause. The numbers don’t lie and they are truly staggering. According to research done by management consulting firm, Janco Associates, the median salary for a blockchain developer is now as much as $127,000.

[index] [11918] [11049] [32453] [33975] [31767] [17361] [42115] [3926] [45847] [2956]

How Much Money do Blockchain Developers Make?

Bitcoin ETF delayed, NZ greenlights Bitcoin salary, XRP death cross, livestream recap ----- Check out my other crypto channels: My other chann... This is the continuation of this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o7EtO..., In this video, I am going to teach you how I got my salary from 2CAPTCHA thr... Good day Digital investors and welcome to the Digital Investor's Digest We are Digital Investor Digest. Every morning we provide detailed breakdown and perso... Bitcoin.com is your premier source for everything Bitcoin related. We help you buy, use, and store your Bitcoin securely. You can read the latest news. We also provide helpful tools and real-time ... What’s the average salary of blockchain developers in the North America? Jason King, co-Founder of Kingsland University, gives a ballpark figure in this episode of "99 Most Commonly Asked ...

#