WalletExplorer.com: smart Bitcoin block explorer
- WalletExplorer.com: smart Bitcoin block explorer
- List Of All Bitcoin Addresses With Balance
- Paying for investigation of pirateat40? : Bitcoin
- Btcst.com User pirateat40 - All Bitcoin Addresses ...
- Is Bitcoin Real or Not? – Spy Briefing
Breaking Theymos - all you have to do is to follow the money
submitted by Obvthrowaway9999 to btc [link] [comments]
I know, you guys are tired of hearing about theymos
, but the only way to get him removed from power is to prove that he broke some rules and have proof to back it up. Some of you have some real time on your hands. You should use it more wisely. There is something called the blockchain, it's a global public ledger, so where theymos thought he was being slick, he really wasn't, and all his misappropriation of funds over the years is going to catch up with him.
All you need to do is spend a little time following the
bitcoins and then connecting the dots. Then show the proof to reddit admins or heck, just show it to the police, he is in the states, and voila, no more theymos.
Let's take an example and walk through it.
- the internet doesn't lie https://web.archive.org/web/20130312110028/http://www.reddit.com/Bitcoin/ using the wayback machine, we can see that theymos setup an "ad campaign" collecting user funds on reddit saying "Bitcoins sent here will eventually be used for a Reddit advertising campaign with the goal of promoting Bitcoin and /Bitcoin: 16KaCJB7fVuT6hvA7wzgzVjAnHz28bNvvh" is this even allowed?, probably, let's not nitpick and continue on....
- here is the address https://blockchain.info/address/16KaCJB7fVuT6hvA7wzgzVjAnHz28bNvvh?offset=50&filter=2 and it is filtered by RECEIVED and on the last page, where we can see the first received tx for this ad campaign bitcoin address is 2011-07-21.
- here is the address https://blockchain.info/address/16KaCJB7fVuT6hvA7wzgzVjAnHz28bNvvh?filter=1 and it is filtered by SENT transactions only, so we can see where he is sending the bitcoins that are for "ADS ONLY" his words not mine
- theres lots of little tx's here and there but alas, what is this, we see on 2011-10-24 he sent himself (bitcointalk forums) money for $12.88, three months after the address was setup.
- before we move on, remember, this is for "ads only" which is for reddit ads or bitcointalk ads (but one could have presumed the ads on reddit were for reddit ads only but its unclear from the wayback machine if it was for both or just reddit)
- now knowing he is sending money to himself and comingling funds (a big no-no), we can look at what he is doing with the bitcointalk address.
- here is the address for bitcointalk that he sent money to from the reddit "ads only" campaign https://blockchain.info/address/17RTTUAiiPqUTKtEggJPec8RxLMi2n9EZ9
- now let's take this address and plug it also into walletexplorer and cross reference it https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/004e35afdbe5b938?from_address=17RTTUAiiPqUTKtEggJPec8RxLMi2n9EZ9
- we can see that the transactions from blockchain.info and walletexplorer match, except walletexplorer is cool cause it does this awesome labeling technique overtime. we can see on the left is the received / and on the right is the sent columns
- from this address 17RTTUAiiPqUTKtEggJPec8RxLMi2n9EZ9 using walletexplorer we can see that funds were sent all over the place - is all this for reddit advertising you are probably asking yourself??? let's continue digging.....
- theymos sent money to bitstamp (they don't do reddit ads, coinbase does though!), sent money to bitpay, mtgox, localbitcoins, btce, oh whats this, he even sent money to Silk Road!!!
- theymos using the bitcointalk donation funds which were comingled with the reddit funds, sent 7.312 bitcoins to SR on 2013-07-21!! what was he doing with all that??
- you can see the tx plain as day right here, oh wait what's that, bitcoin reddit is the sender.... oops https://blockchain.info/tx/e889e838c82b8f2ab7910758362f56d97deb021767652acdeaf0f4c800aea816 $3,140.33 did SR do ads? LOL probably not! oh thermos!
- here is another fun one, you can see how theymos sent 100 btc to known scammer pirateat40, which theymos was in on the scam (can someone confirm this???). what was he doing sending 100 btc from bitcointalk to pirateat40, here is the tx, it says sent from bitcointalk forums.... oops again thermos! https://blockchain.info/tx/1a11bf84f007910f19e86d507f8d751c9bccd6c436832f4e832cad07fa2c5273 2012-05-21
- reddit ads campaign address 16KaCJB7fVuT6hvA7wzgzVjAnHz28bNvvh final balance: ZERO
- bitcointalk address 17RTTUAiiPqUTKtEggJPec8RxLMi2n9EZ9 final balance: $3.38
- WHERE DID ALL THE MONEY GO?????
I'm sure if you guys keep on digging you will keep on finding more, but those tidbits might be enough to send him away for what is called embezzlement! look it up, or at the very least, taking redditors money and misusing it for his own personal funds!!!
How trustworthy are the authors of Electrum and MultiBit ? Why are their signing keys not verified?
submitted by DrunkRaven to Bitcoin [link] [comments]
I was a bit alarmed by these two posts some weeks ago: http://www.reddit.com/Bitcoin/comments/210fgj/there_is_an_pgp_imposter_of_bitcoin_dev_gavin/ http://www.reddit.com/Bitcoin/comments/1tin7f/warning_a_fake_electrum_website_with_malware_is/
In the first case, basically somebody registered a PGP key which at first glance looked like the signing key from Gavin Andresen. Such a key could be used to sign malware which appears as the true bitcoin client. This would only be detected if people check carefully. If people do NOT check it - maybe rushing in a situation where the network needs a quick fix - the consequences could be truly disastrous.
In the second case, the Electrum website was actually
faked to distribute malware which was camouflaged as the Electrum client. If people install such a client, it could send their bitcoins anywhere - this kind of attack can really cause a lot of grief, too.
Note that in some simple setups, it might be possible to recognize the faked web site by its address, but in other cases, this will not be possible - think of insidious attacks on home routers or exploits of the recent Apple "goto" bug, which essentially disables SSL protection.
In these cases, and whenever youinstall bitcoin software, it is always important to check for digital signatures of the maintainers, which can warrant the authenticity of the code. And, doing this properly includes verification of their keys
To make it short, I was newly installing Electrum and I decided to do it right and to look after the digital signatures and whether the signatures properly certified in a web of trust. Now, trust paths can be looked up by databases like these: http://pgp.cs.uu.nl/
It works so that in the "from" field, you enter YOUR key ID (which needs to be connected to the web of trust graph). In the "to" field, you enter the key ID of the signing key for the software. Now, you should be able to find at least one trust path from you to the signing key for the software. For example, if Mark Shuttleworth wants to verify the key of Gavin Andresen, he enters his key ID: D54F0847 into the "from" field, and Gavin's key - 1FC730C1 - into the "to" field. This will look as here: http://pgp.cs.uu.nl/mk_path.cgi?FROM=D54F0847&TO=1FC730C1&PATHS=trust+paths
The trouble is, if Mark looks up the key for ThomasV, this looks so: http://pgp.cs.uu.nl/mk_path.cgi?FROM=D54F0847&TO=7F9470E6&PATHS=trust+paths
that is currently, no trust paths to ThomasV's key are found
. The same is true for Jim Burton, maintainer of Multibit. In other words, ThomasV's key cannot be verified, if somebody does not has other means.
Well, somebody could look into the bitcoin forum - but first, the forum can be and has been hacked. And second, a forum identity does not mean much. Pirateat40 had an account, too, as well as the owner of bitcoinica.
I do not suspect the developers of working in an evil plot, but honestly, I'd really like to know a bit more.
Now, I have a few questions
- Who knows ThomasV ? Can a few prominent GPG users from the Bitcoin community who know him kindly sign his key and connect him to the larger web-of-trust ? Otherwise, it would be much more difficult to thwart attacks like against Gavin.
- What do we know about Electrum's (and MultiBit's) developers? What is actually their expertise? Doing crypto well is damn hard. Why should we assume that the have the technical astuteness to move many many coins around safely?
- Bitcoin-qt has been audited many many times by knowledgeable people. Has the Electrum source code been audited as well? To which degree? Has it been audited at all?
: A few developers have posted here... can other people confirm what they say? Can it be proven? Anyone was at that conference? Edit: As an important clarification:
The fact that a key can be found on a keyserver, is signed by some entity, or is contained in the "strong set" of the PGP web of trust or in any web of trust does not
necessarily imply that the key is linked to an authentic identity, end even less that the owner is a good guy. It only provides a mean to check this identity and to support the assumption that the identity is correct, independent from hacking attempts.
And as a reply to some badly downvoted comment: Yes, knowing or probably knowing the identity of the auhtor of some code is by no means a substitute for skilled people carefully checking the code and any change in it.
The Bet: BMR and Sheep to die in a year
submitted by gwern to SilkRoad [link] [comments]
EDIT: No one has offered to accept any of the bets, so I am declaring this offer withdrawn.
BMR & Sheep have demonstrated their danger, but few black-market-users seem to genuinely appreciate this. I am publicly betting that they will fail in the near-future. If you think I am wrong, just try to take my money and prove me wrong! Otherwise, spare us your cheap talk.
Hi! I'm Gwern Branwen
. You may remember me from such black-market webpages as Silk Road: Theory & Practice
, and /silkroad
. Today I'm here to talk to you about BlackMarket Reloaded & Sheep Marketplace.
(A signed version of this 30 October 2013 post will be posted as a comment, because I wish to use Markdown formatting; my PGP key is available
With the fall of SR, we're all very sad: it was a good site which performed a useful function. But life goes on, so it's no surprise we're all moving on to new black markets. That said, I am concerned by the accumulating pattern I am seeing around BMR and Sheep, and by the delusional optimism of many of the users.
BlackMarket Reloaded, since the fall, has been marked by a pattern of arrogance, technical incompetence, dismissal of problems, tolerance for sellers keep buyer addresses & issuing threats, astounding tolerance for information leaks (all the implementation information
, and particularly the VPS incident with the user data leak; mirrors: 1
), etc. We know his code is shitty and smells like vulnerabilities (programmer in 3 different IRC channels I frequent quoted bits of the leaked code with a mixture of hilarity & horror), yet somehow backopy expects to rewrite it better, despite being the same person who wrote the first version and the basic security principle that new versions have lots of bugs. (I'm not actually bothered by the DoS attacks; they're issues for any site, much less hidden services.)
And then there's the things he's not telling us. Atlantis shut down because they were worried about contacts from LE, and thus far this shut down seems to have saved them; but BMR has been around several times longer than Atlantis - would it not beggar belief if LE had not made contacts, attempted SR-style stings, or infiltrated BMR staff? And remember how we were able to discover all sorts of leaks in DPR's opsec once we had the indictment and knew what to look for? Or consider the claims being made about the Project Black Flag Leaks, where someone claims to have accessed laundry list of information
from its internals - only after
Metta DPR decided to rip-and-run. If this is what we see publicly for BMR, what on earth is going on behind the scenes?
backopy should have handed on BMR weeks ago, but is still around. He seems to plan to repeat SDPR's mistakes exactly: leak information all over the place, never retire, and just keep on until he is busted and takes who-knows-how-many people down to prison with him. He has learned nothing. What, exactly, is his exit strategy? What goals does he have and when will they ever be satisfied? He has been running BMR for more than 2 years now, and has not left. How does this story end: of a man who does not know his limits, does not have ability equal to the task, and refuses to quit while he's ahead? It ends with a party-van, that's how it ends.
And hardly anyone seems troubled by this! The BMR subreddit is full of bustle; people are even hailing backopy as a "hero" for allowing withdrawal of bitcoins. (How generous of him.)
Is Sheep any better? No. BMR is troubled and probably infiltrated at this point, but Sheep may well be a dead market walking at this point. No one has a good word to say about its coding, so there may well be BMR-style issues in its future. More importantly: the veriest Google search would turn up that clearnet site, and it has been pointed out
that the clearnet Czech site hosted by HexaGeek was uncannily
similar to the actual hidden service. It uses almost the same exact technology, and the official explanation is that they had "fans" (fans? who set up, many months ago, before anyone gave a damn about Sheep, an entire functioning mirror while cloning the software stack and being in a foreign non-English-speaking country just like the Sheep admins?). Ridiculous! DPR may have set up a WordPress site, but at least 'altoid' didn't run an entire SR mirror! (He left that to onion.to & tor2web.org.). Sheep's likely about one subpoena of HexaGeek away from fun party times in the party-van.
I am uninterested in seeing Sheep/BMR busted and lots of newbies caught because they can't appreciate the patterns here. People don't take mere criticism seriously, and even if I lay it all out like here, and I mention that I have an excellent track record of predictions
, they still won't because anyone can doom-monger and issue warnings, it won't get through to them. I want to get through to them - I want them to understand the risks they're taking, I want them to reflexively use PGP, and I want them to leave balances on sites for as short a time as possible. So! I am putting my money where my mouth is.
I and 3 others are publicly wagering ฿4 ($816 at today's rate), ฿1 each, on the following 4 bets:
- BMR will not be operating in 6 months:
25%; 1:3 (you risk ฿3 and if BMR is still operating, you win our ฿1, else you lose the ฿3 to us)
- BMR will not be operating in 12 months
40%; 1:1.5 (you risk ฿1.5 & BMR is operating in a year, you win our ฿1, else lose ฿1.5)
- Sheep will not be operating in 6 months
30%; 1:2.3 (your ฿2.3 against our ฿1)
- Sheep will not be operating in 12 months
60%; 1:0.66 (you risk ฿0.66 against our ฿1)
The ฿4 are currently stored in 1AZvaBEJMiK8AJ5GvfvLWgHjWgL59TRPGy
(proof of control: IOqEiWYWtYWFmJaKa29sOUqfMLrSWAWhHxqqB3bcVHuDpcn8rA0FkEqvRYmdgQO4yeXeNHtwr9NSqI9J79G+yPA= is the signature by 1Az of the string "This address contains bitcoins for the BMSheep bet run by gwern.").
- BMR = kss62ljxtqiqdfuq.onion
- Sheep = sheep5u64fi457aw.onion
- The exact definition of 'not operating' includes but is not limited to this: on noon EST of 30 April 2013 (6-months) or 30 October 2014 (12-months), if Nanotube can visit the relevant black-market, create a buyer account, deposit bitcoins, and order an item, then the site is operating. If deposits or new accounts or purchases are not allowed or not possible, it is not operating.
At his own discretion, the arbitrator can take into account other factors, like widespread reports that a market has been raided and turned into a sting operation.
Arbitration & escrow are being provided by Nanotube, a long-time Bitcoin
user & -otc trader
, who has handled some past bets (most famously, the ฿10,000 bet between the Ponzi schemer pirateat40 & Vandroiy
) and I believe can be trusted to escrow this one as well; he has agreed to a nominal fee of 1%.
(I am not using Bets of Bitcoin because they have a dishonest & exploitative rule-set, and I am not sure Predictious
would allow these bets.)
If you disagree and are man enough to take our bets, post the amount you are betting on which bet, and Nanotube will supply an address for you to transfer your bitcoin to. When it arrives in his wallet, then our bet will be in effect.
May the most accurate beliefs win.
If Bitcoin is really going to become the new currency of the world...
If Bitcoin really became the new currency of the world, it would need to accommodate the lowest common denominator of people. As it stands now, most people who are really into bitcoin are probably considered at least moderately intelligent. submitted by tpbtc to Bitcoin [link] [comments]
I'm going to use the word 'idiot' in this post from here on out, just to make shit easier to follow.
Idiots need something and/or someone to cover their asses. Just like children need their parents to cover their asses. If the neighbor kid steals from them, they cry to Mommy or Daddy about it. Then the parents go ahead and handle it.
The same is needed for bitcoin. A lot of this wallet/address/private-key/public-key/blockchain talk is definitely complicated to idiots. If you really think about it, an idiot could lose their entire financial worth because of their non-understanding of bitcoin and the securities that are needed to go with it. That simply isn't fair when their livelihood is at stake in our current society, regardless of what their level of intelligence is.
Because of that alone, bitcoin will never surpass fiat as it currently stands. At some point there will need to be an entity that arises, that is similar to a bank(yes I know that analogy alone will get me downvoted). But everyone reading this needs to think about their understanding of bitcoin security, versus that of an idiot's understanding. Those idiots need a place to put their coins if this ever becomes mainstream. They need a level of cover, just like a child needs his/her parent's cover.
The snide comment that if you're too stupid to understand it, you deserve to lose your coins, simply will not fly. It would be great if it did, but then again it would be great if people with low IQs couldn't reproduce, right? You have to understand the fact that modern society revolves around accommodation for all people starting at the lowest common denominator. Bitcoin cannot ignore that if it wants to be more than a niche.
This post is probably way before it's time. Not because I'm the first to think about it. But because it's way before the time something like this is needed, before the idiots need a way to store their bitcoins, before the banks and fiat start crumbling(lots of ifs there). At that point they would need to be accommodated. As it stands now, they cannot be.
This issue needs to be solved before bitcoin can even attempt to compete with fiat on a noticeable scale, let alone surpass it. Who can or will do that? We've already seen what happened with pirateat40 for example. So how can this be accomplished with full trust and blame? Can it be accomplished with full trust and blame that doesn't involve the government? That is a big question that the idiots will need answered, and those idiots are necessary to full adoption, whether you like it or not.
So what will it be? A massive education for the idiots so they can handle their own coins, and simply suck it up if something bad happens? Or will there be some entity that provides them the security they need, so that they can continue spending by simply swiping a plastic card(funded with bitcoin instead of their fiat)?
TL;DR: Idiots need fallbacks and security, that currently is not offered to them with bitcoin. Sucks to be them, sure, but there are so many of them that such a response won't fly in the big scheme of things. They need to be accommodated or taught. Who or what will do it, and how?
Vladimir (Atlantis admin) official statement
submitted by reaperx2 to SilkRoad [link] [comments]
I saw this posted in the SR forum and figured I would repost in case others have difficulty accessing the forums. Hi all,
It has come to our attention that some users on Silk Road believe the following;
1. That I am a scammer and was involved in a Ponzi scam on Silk Road. 2. The moderators at Atlantis market are deleting user comments. 3. Our forums term of use policy is aimed to arrest people and record information. 4. That we are DDoS'ing Silk Road. 5. Our PGP system is crackable.
I'd like to take the time to address each point and if you have any questions, please don't hesitate to reply to this thread. The staff members at Atlantis and I are happy to address your questions.
1) This belief has come into existence as 'Vladimir' was a scammer on Silk Road and thus people thought I was the same person as him. Unfortunately without knowing Vladimir's past history, this is my name and the one I have chosen to use. Hypothetically if I was Vladimir, why would I use a scammers alias at a market place which deals directly with user funds? It wouldn't help build trust in our market place and doesn't make any sense at all. Its the equivalent of pirateat40 creating a new Bitcoin Savings and Trust scheme and asking people to re-invest in it. We're proud to say that in our 7 weeks of operation, we have suffered no down time, no users have lost funds and security concerns have been addressed promptly (like increasing PGP key support up to 16Kbits).
2) We have deleted posts only related to spam, posts involving unfounded claims or accusations (FUD) and have deleted no posts in which people have given us criticism, bug reports or requests about improving security. You can check the relevant forum sections to find examples of this. We actively encourage this feedback as it helps us create a better market place. We are here to help users and are happy to reply to any security concerns or criticism you have. We have also created a sticky topic in the general forums for people to post whatever conspiracy theories they like. We will not be moderating this thread however the other forum rules still apply.
3) We used the default term of service which comes with the forum software. You can find an exact replica when you download and install the SMF software. This has now been updated.
4) We believe competition is healthy and believe that Dead Pirate Roberts is a great leader. We also need to shed the light that Silk Road has had technical issues in the past, even when we weren't around. Things like item listing image hijacking, denial of service attacks, site upgrades and switching hosting providers all caused down time. Although it would assist in us gaining more market share if our largest competitor is down, we have no desire to resort to dodgy tactics. We believe that what goes around comes around.
5) The auto-encryption service only works IF the user or vendors uploads their PGP public key (we support key sizes of 1024 - 16384 bits). However, Atlantis also supports manual encryption outside of Atlantis in which users can use a PGP client to encrypt their message. Atlantis administrators and law enforcement could not decipher the encrypted message without the users private key. With all this said, the security comes down to the end user. If they don't trust the auto-encryption service, they can STILL manually encrypt the message outside of Atlantis and thus there is absolutely no risk of anyone being able to decipher the message. To this day, PGP with large key sizes (>= 4096bits) is still uncrackable, you can find more information about it here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy#Security_quality
. Noting: 'there is no known method which will allow a person or group to break PGP encryption by cryptographic or computational means.'
As stated earlier, if you have any concerns please don't hesitate to reply to this thread. Lastly, we'd like to thank all the people who have put their trust in Atlantis and believe in where we are heading. The ride is only just starting and we're glad to have you as part of Atlantis http://atlmlxbk2mbupwgr.onion/index.php?topic=235.0
Legality of cryptocurrencies
Regulations or positions of some countries about cryptoworld Because governments can sometimes be a bit touchy about attempts to create alternatives to the legal tender they enjoy a monopoly on printing, a wise investor might wonder about the legal status of cryptocurrencies. Indeed, the disruptive potential of these technologies has made governments around the world nervous, as they have struggled to devise appropriate regulations for the cryptocurrency realm without stifling innovation. Most potential investors have nothing to worry about from a legal standpoint, but it pays to do one’s homework. submitted by Which_Blockchain to u/Which_Blockchain [link] [comments]
Regulations or positions of some countries about cryptoworld Some countries have banned or ruled unconstitutional the use of cryptocurrencies within their borders, while others have embraced them or even announced plans to issue their own. Of course, due to the inherently decentralized nature of cryptocurrencies, enforcement has proven difficult. Taxes levied on profits made trading cryptocurrencies vary based on their legal classification. Check the laws in your country, and make sure you abide by them when investing. Questions of legality in major markets have caused temporary dips in cryptocurrency prices over the years, but they have always recovered. Keep reading for a brief history of legal rulings and government announcements related to bitcoin that have helped shape the current ecosystem.
Payments services firms Paxum and Tradehill temporarily cease bitcoin exchange activities due to legal concerns raised by Canadian regulators.
28 March 2013
Cypriot investors drive up bitcoin prices seeking a refuge for savings when a government bailout program threatens to tap bank deposits.
14 May 2013
The United States Department of Homeland Security seizes almost $3 million from a subsidiary of the Mt. Gox exchange, claiming that the business is illegally engaged in money transmission without a license.
30 August 2013
Tradehill stops exchanging bitcoin, again due to regulatory uncertainty, indicating a growing need for government clarification on the legal status of cryptocurrency.
The U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation arrests operator of Silk Road dark web marketplace Ross Ulbricht, alias “Dread Pirate Roberts,” charges him with computer hacking, money laundering, drug trafficking and attempted murder, shuts down the site and seizes over 170,000 bitcoins. In the wake of the shutdown, numerous other illicit marketplaces emerge, but are prone to exit scams in which operators abscond with bitcoins held in escrow.
18 November 2013
U.S. Senate holds hearing titled “Beyond Silk Road: Potential Risks, Threats, and Promises of Virtual Currencies.” Members express reservations about the potential illicit applications of cryptocurrencies so vividly illustrated by Silk Road, frustration at the difficulty of regulating something so difficult to understand, but ultimately hope that government will be able to create a system in which decent people have a “chance to try and play by the rules.”
22 November 2013
China’s central bank issues an equivocal statement on bitcoin that nonetheless greenlights Chinese participation in cryptocurrency exchange and investment, prompting huge price gains over subsequent weeks.
05 December 2013
Backpedaling somewhat in response to the widespread use of bitcoin to circumvent limits on capital outflows, China bans banks and other financial institutions from dealing with or offering services relating to bitcoin, ruling that it is not a currency.
25 March 2014
The U.S. Internal Revenue Service issues its first guidelines for bitcoin, ruling that it is to be taxed as property, not treated as currency.
10 April 2014
Under government pressure, Chinese banks begin to shut down accounts belonging to bitcoin exchanges. Prices drop 10%, but many exchanges exploit loopholes and offshore parts of their businesses to continue operating.
The state of New York announces plans to develop licensing requirements for businesses dealing in bitcoin or related services, which proves extremely unpopular with cryptocurrency advocates.
06 November 2014
Trendon Shavers, alias “pirateat40,” arrested for defrauding bitcoin investors in Ponzi scheme in 2012.
19 December 2014
Bitcoin entrepreneur and proponent Charlie Shrem sentenced to two years in prison for illegal money transmission charges related to the Silk Road marketplace.
25 January 2015
Coinbase navigates regulatory frameworks to win approval to operate a fully-fledged bitcoin exchange in 25 U.S. states and sets sights on further expansion.
25 March 2015
Hong Kong officials warn against potential fraud on exchanges, but indicate they will take a light hand regulating cryptocurrencies, classifying them not as legal tender but as “virtual commodities.”
29 May 2015
Ross Ulbricht receives sentence: life in prison without parole. Judge Katherine Forrest explicitly seeks to make an example of him and thereby discourage others from using cryptocurrency and the relative anonymity of the Internet to flout the law.
01 August 2015
Mark Karpeles, former Mt. Gox CEO, arrested in Japan and charged with falsification of records relating to the solvency of the exchange during its collapse.
10 August 2015
Deadline hits for compliance with New York regulators’ “BitLicense” rules, leading many exchanges to stop serving customers in the State.
22 October 2015
Crypto advocates hail a European court ruling that VAT does not apply to bitcoin and other cryptocurrency transactions, thereby classifying them as currency, not property.
10 November 2016
The state of North Carolina creates legislation to address bitcoin and money transmission, which regards businesses dealing in virtual currencies as subject to the same set of rules and licensing requirements that govern transmission
10 March 2017
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission denies Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss authorization to create a bitcoin-based ETF, citing inadequate regulation of cryptocurrency exchanges.
28 March 2017
The SEC denies the Winklevoss brothers’ second request for authorization of a bitcoin ETF, again citing concerns about the lack of regulation and potential for fraud on the exchanges.
01 April 2017
Japan recognizes bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies as legal tender and lays the groundwork for supportive regulations intended to permit legitimate investment while discouraging money laundering and terrorist financing.
04 September 2017
China prohibits fundraising via initial coin offerings, which it considers illegal.
07 September 2017
The European Central Bank rules out the possibility of Estonia launching its own national cryptocurrency, reaffirms the privileged status of the Euro as legal tender, and cites concerns that national cryptocurrencies would undermine financial regulations.
06 December 2017
Softening its initial stance, Russian regulators indicate that new rules may allow the purchase of cryptocurrencies, but forbid or heavily restrict mining activities.
07 December 2017
Regulators in South Korea ban trading in bitcoin futures as well as initial coin offerings(ICO), but will permit cryptocurrency exchanges to continue operations.
"Loaded" admits to holding coins that may or may not have been involved with Silk Road and/or Pirateat40's ponzi scheme.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=321265.msg3648319#msg3648319 https://blockchain.info/address/1491KpNqoY1vGE2Rzdd76BCsuXK7QepNGU submitted by the_bob to Bitcoin [link] [comments]
As you can see from the Bitcointalk message, Loaded states he has holdings of ~158,000 Bitcoins. Those coins were a single hop away from the notorious 1DkyB address. Speculation from 2012 was that this address was the main repository of Pirateat40's Bitcoin Savings & Trust ponzi scheme. Loaded has since signed messages with Bitcoin private keys that control coins poorly tumbled from the address that contained 158k BTC (since there was no Joinmarket or any mixing service that could handle that amount of BTC).
It is possible "Loaded" is Trendon Shavers.
8u5a17tzalfw 3x995bl69avh f8riog24o0u5s 2aeni0x6aq79z pvaf3hnqarcw x5beudef6xc0 yt55srp4lppy h37urmvn0m3 7ylgjhzngxbn40v 05ftagjxxoo4i0 bdl4nlm0nqla8y1 g637lel1d5ucvn ... Bitcoin, on the other hand, began as a protocol written in computer code. In some ways, it is no more or less a piece of math than the dollar is. But it is much harder to wrap your brain around whether and why it could function as money. This poses a real problem for government regulators. The Bitcoin economy is growing and expanding by the day, with ever more of a commercial infrastructure ... limit my search to r/Bitcoin. use the following search parameters to narrow your results: subreddit:subreddit find submissions in "subreddit" author:username find submissions by "username" site:example.com find submissions from "example.com" url:text search for "text" in url selftext:text search for "text" in self post contents self:yes (or self:no) include (or exclude) self posts nsfw:yes (or ... If you were around the Bitcoin scene last year, you’ll remember the build-up and crash-out of the largest Bitcoin pyramid scam yet, run by “pirateat40“.. Turns out they got him. What’s encouraging is not just that he was caught, but that the American law seem to be treating Bitcoin and its community with a certain amount of respect, with a lot of the SEC release having fairly positive ... WalletExplorer.com: smart Bitcoin block explorer Bitcoin block explorer with address grouping and wallet labeling Enter address, txid, firstbits, internal wallet id or service name:
         
Bitcoin Savings and Trust Scammer Found
In this video I discuss new information about the bitcoin savings and trust. I talk about how Trendon T. Shavers created a pyramid scheme offering investors 7% yield a week. This man went by ...